Insight

More activity doesn’t mean more progress.

It is tempting to start by defining a vacancy. We need a marketing manager. A head of marketing. Perhaps a marketing director. Once a title exists, the conversation quickly shifts towards responsibilities, salary, experience and recruitment.

But a job title doesn’t tell you what the organisation actually needs.

Perhaps the strategy needs sharpening. Perhaps there is already a capable team, but it lacks direction and senior leadership. Perhaps marketing has grown organically and responsibilities are now fragmented across people, agencies and departments. Or perhaps the organisation genuinely needs to build permanent senior capability.

Before deciding who to hire, first define what needs to change.

Many organisations already have more marketing capability than they realise. There may be good people, strong external specialists and plenty of ideas, but insufficient structure around priorities, responsibilities and decision-making.

In that situation, adding another permanent role can increase complexity rather than reduce it.

The better question is what the existing organisation needs to perform at a higher level. That might be clearer ownership, stronger processes, different responsibilities, better agency management or more senior strategic direction.

Sometimes the organisation needs another person. Sometimes the people are already there and the system around them needs improving.

If a responsibility is structural, central to the business and requires continuous ownership, building permanent internal capability usually makes sense.

That is particularly true when marketing has become strategically important to growth and requires someone who understands the organisation deeply, develops the team and participates continuously in senior decision-making.

But a permanent appointment is a long-term organisational choice. It shouldn’t become the automatic solution to a temporary problem.

Before recruiting, it is worth asking whether the organisation already knows what the role should achieve, what mandate it will have and how it should fit into the wider organisation.

Otherwise you risk hiring someone into a problem that hasn’t yet been defined.

External expertise can be useful when a specific strategic question needs solving, when specialist knowledge is temporarily required or when an independent perspective helps challenge assumptions.

An advisor can help create direction without becoming part of the permanent organisation. An agency or specialist can add capabilities that would make little sense to build internally.

The important distinction is between outsourcing responsibility and adding expertise.

External partners work best when the organisation remains clear about what it owns, what it expects and how decisions are made.

Growth, transition, restructuring or a leadership gap can create a different requirement. The organisation may know broadly where it wants to go but need someone experienced enough to take responsibility for getting there.

That is where interim or fractional leadership can make sense.

The role moves beyond advising from the outside. It means stepping into the organisation, setting priorities, making decisions, leading people and partners and creating the structure needed to move forward.

Ideally, that involvement also has an end point: strengthen the organisation, build capability and hand responsibility back when the organisation is ready.

Hire
When the need is structural, long-term and important enough to justify permanent internal ownership.

Reorganise
When the capability largely exists, but responsibilities, priorities, processes or leadership need to change.

Bring in outside expertise
When the organisation needs specialist knowledge, independent advice or experienced leadership without immediately creating a permanent position.

These choices are not mutually exclusive. An interim leader might prepare the organisation for a permanent hire. An advisor might discover that restructuring the existing team is enough. External specialists might remain part of the model even after internal capability has been strengthened.

The objective isn’t to choose one model in principle. It is to build the model that fits what the organisation actually needs.

A new hire can be the right decision. So can reorganising the existing team or temporarily bringing senior expertise inside.

The expensive mistake is deciding on the solution before understanding the requirement.

Start with the ambition. Understand the gap. Look at the capability already available. Then decide what should be built, changed or added.

Build what you need for the long term. Add what you need to move forward now.

The real question is often behind the question.Strategy

The real question is often behind the question.

Giezen ConsultingGiezen Consulting19 september 2026
When marketing problems aren’t really marketing problems.Organisation

When marketing problems aren’t really marketing problems.

Giezen ConsultingGiezen Consulting19 september 2026
Should you hire, reorganise or bring in outside expertise?Leadership

Should you hire, reorganise or bring in outside expertise?

Giezen ConsultingGiezen Consulting19 september 2026

Leave a Reply